Every number, and the run that produced it.

This page is generated from docs/proof/claims.toml and the evidence files it points at. It is not written by hand. The same generator runs in the project's health check, so a number that drifts from its evidence fails the build rather than reaching a reader.

Two claims are deliberately unpublished and say so in the ledger, and several are marked read by a human: they are historical or rounded statements that no automatic check can settle, and pretending otherwise would be a false green.
ClaimValueEvidence
The run's own clock, compared against the same work timed by hand.
Machine time for one deployed run of the whole lifecycle
machine time only; the human approval is timed separately and excluded
45.1 s of machine timespikes/judge_run/evidence.json
The single human approval the same run required22.4 s human approvalspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
Seconds from the supplier packet to the case parking for a human
the recorded take's own run; the narration rounds it to whole seconds
Parked in 11.9 sspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
The budget one deployed run must finish inside130sspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
The same work done by hand, timed
author-timed, not practitioner-reviewed
663.5 sspikes/manual_baseline/evidence.json
Steps in the hand-done walkthrough
author-timed, not practitioner-reviewed
20 stepsspikes/manual_baseline/evidence.json
Steps of that walkthrough the run removes
measured against an author-timed baseline, not a practitioner-reviewed one
19 of which the run removesspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
Business days the two cases span
the lifecycle clock is compressed, and the compression is disclosed on screen
380 simulated business daysspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
Checks this run re-executes every time it reports them, not numbers quoted from an earlier pass.
Contracts re-verified at capture timenine contractsspikes/core_contracts/evidence.json
Graded domain cases, all passing
a deterministic pass metric; re-run the suite before citing it
24/24spikes/domain_evals/evidence.json
Mean score across the graded domain suite
a deterministic pass metric; re-run the suite before citing it
100%spikes/domain_evals/evidence.json
Contract and unit tests re-executed by the run that reports them
re-executed by the harness, not quoted from a previous run
629 passedspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
What that run actually wrote to the ERP (enterprise resource planning: the system of record for suppliers and purchasing), and what it refused to write twice.
Fields entered into the ERP without a human retyping them22 fieldsspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
Days a non-compliant supplier was actually held from purchasing
claimed only where both the hold and its release executed in the ERP
5 enforced hold daysspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
Decisions policy requires a human to make1 policy-required interventionspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
Duplicate ERP writes after a retry
the judge run itself retried nothing (commands_retried_then_succeeded: 0); the retried ERP write that proves singularity is the sweep probe in spikes/core_contracts/evidence.json, so this number is not spoken or shown in the video (2026-08-25)
0 duplicate writes after a retryspikes/judge_run/evidence.json
What running this project costs to operate, kept here for traceability even where it hasn’t been turned into a prose claim anywhere else yet.
Gross running cost for the whole project, month to date
before credits, measured from the billing account rather than from published rates
$16.63spikes/cost_posture/evidence.json
Cloud credit remaining
console-only; no API exposes the balance, so it is passed in when the measurement is taken
held (reason in the ledger)spikes/cost_posture/evidence.json
Measured daily uptime of the screening VMheld (reason in the ledger)spikes/cost_posture/evidence.json
A second Google model, measured against this project’s own documents. Reading them correctly was not enough to adopt it, so both halves of that result are published together.
Documents an open-weights Gemma read correctly, served by Vertex AI
paired with gemma_format_conformant and never quotable without it: this number is the content the model read, after key renaming, and says nothing about whether it returned the required structure
6 of 6spikes/gemma_extraction/evidence.json
The same documents on which that model returned the required output format
paired with gemma_content_correct and never quotable without it: alone it reads as a model that could not extract, which the measurement disproves
0 of 6spikes/gemma_extraction/evidence.json
The same Gemma weights run locally, where the runtime constrains generation to the required structure
author workstation, not Google Cloud; carries no deployment claim
6 of 6spikes/gemma_extraction/evidence.json
Median time for one served-Gemma extraction, against the deployed step's own median8.8 sspikes/gemma_extraction/evidence.json
Statements a human read and confirmed by hand, because no automatic check can settle them.
The ERP hold was written minutes before the rejection committedread the evidence filespikes/hitl_reject/evidence.json
The graded suite passed 8/8 when the generation pin was measuredread the evidence filespikes/domain_evals/evidence.json
Reasoning tokens fell to effectively none and the timed sequence shortenedread the evidence filespikes/gemini_37_eval/evidence.json
What the published build-piece article already said, checked here against the run it described at the time.
The build piece states the graded suite passed 8/8 with reasoning pinned offread the evidence filespikes/domain_evals/evidence.json
The build piece states a two-supplier run dropped from 85 to 57 secondsread the evidence filespikes/gemini_37_eval/evidence.json